data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96450/964509ff21870d2b69f37242c6096bb243b80ffb" alt=""
I just got some photographs of some of my older skeletal work. I was interested in the body, and I found that I enjoyed the aesthetic of simple ink drawings to abstract the skeleton. These were done in india ink, watered down in lighter places to imply distance.
Within this series, I spent a large amount of time on the pelvis, which appealed to me both because I appreciate its shape and because I think there is an interesting play between the "inappropriateness" the bone structure describes anatomically and the sterility which comes with stripping away the skin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6485b/6485bef3a566dcd93246f4f6f5916d514b4c3238" alt=""
I also became interested in the space between ribs and spine. My early drawings struggled with coding the ribs as being separate from spine with a flat black ink, but I found that as I watered down ink to describe one or the other, an interesting, exaggerated cavity was created.
This was among my favorites. I did a few which were a monochromatic blue, but I don't think they were as successful as this pure black and white abstraction.
Thanks a lot Joe for your comment on my TOY #1, I had a look at your paintings and still have to understand them, but I'm not mad for abstract... my fault because my mind is on realistic painting, but I promise i'll study mor on other art movements! Hear you soon
ReplyDelete